Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (3227)	12/12/2007 11:34:24 AM
From: TimF	Respond to of 42652

My agenda, to the extent I have one, is certainly not to defend the current system at all costs. I don't consider it an ideal system. Your perception of posted anecdotes, is that they serve no purpose, unless you selectively post one that negatively portrays Canadian health care as stated before. I never said that they never serve any purpose, my point was more that most of them are not very useful. "Most" does not equal "all", and "not very useful" might be similar to "serves little purpose", but doesn't mean "serves no purpose". Before that it was "your doctors have no freedom but are puppets of the government." I never said that, or anything similar to that, about either American or Canadian doctors. Just because I don't like the Canadian system and don't want it for the US, doesn't mean I think the US system is perfect or the Canadian system is some sort of dystopian hell.