Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SONS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cooters who wrote (1280)	12/13/2007 10:44:44 AM
From: Lhn5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575

Chandler? Who??? What stock?

To: Cooters who wrote (1280)	12/13/2007 10:49:30 AM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 1575

I simply do not understand how the stock can be flat to down with this level of accumulation! We had a chat. He's giving me a chance to get back in cheaper before it goes into the 7s and 8s.

To: Cooters who wrote (1280)	12/18/2007 12:01:45 PM
From: estatemakr	Respond to of 1575

It is strange. Senate now owns 64 million out of 268 million shares outstanding, or 24% of the company! Can anyone else think of a similar situation, where a supposedly passive investor, waltzes in, and seemingly has the green light from both management and other significant shareholders, to accumulate such a large position??? No poison pill, no fuss whatsoever from other large shareholders.... Analysts are tepid at best on the stock, as I do not believe there is a single "buy" rating out there? Also, there are 27 million shares sold short, so if this accumulation by Senate doesn't cause a short-cover rally, then what happens when and if Senate buying dries up once and for all?? We see a big drop perhaps.......?? Weird. There is ZERO insider selling going on from those within the company. Interesting stuff.