Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (18435)	12/15/2007 1:26:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

Which is why I keep referring you to creationists. You really need to stop banging that dead horse. In simple terms, here's libby's (lack of) logic.. A) If creationism (earth a few thousand years old, dinosaurs on Noah's Ark, literal Adam and Eve, etc., etc..) is prima facie silliness, along the same lines of reality as the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus (which in fact it is). And... B) If some creationists are also skeptical that humans are primarily responsible for climate changes (a thoroughly reasonable point of view). C) Therefore, rejection of climate change hysteria is equal to and on a par with creationist belief. Continuing to harp on this ridiculous juxtaposition only serves to make you look stupid and/or disingenuous. You really need to find another dead horse to kick..