To: Petz who wrote (244571 ) 12/17/2007 8:09:36 PM From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872 re quibbles. >> 1. Q1 CPU revenue vs. Q4 is on average UP 2% for the years 1999-2006 That's very surprising to me. Completely in the opposite direction of what I expect. I'll have to dig a little. The figure I have seen is that of the total number of PC's sold in a year, 43% are sold in first half, and 57% are sold in second half. And that's where the expectations of seasonality come from. In the case of AMD, at this time, There will be so many charges and writedowns, and changes in products that comparison will be difficult. For now, I'll reiterate my forecast of a large loss in the vicinity of $400m. Do you see a significantly smaller loss ? Maybe even a profit ? ----------- >> 2. Tax loss selling is mostly over, Not at all. year end tax selling by individuals will continue to the last day of the year. ---------- >> 3. virtualization performance penalty of 50% The performance penalty on virtualization is undocumented. Even if the penalty was small, no general purpose server manager will buy a processor with a known defect that occurs in a common application. People who already bought the chip will use the patch, because what choice do they have ? But new sales will be zero. Do you see any barc's in the market ? ---------- >> 4. It also appears consistent with them saying HPC work is not adversely affected. Barcelona servers in HPC market don't use virtualization. << That's exactly precisely, almost to the letter, what I said. Which is that AMD continues to sell barc to HPC customers because they do not use virtualization. Are you posting your response as a quibble, or affirmation ? Looks like agreement to me.