SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 5:42:49 PM
From: dougSF30Respond to of 275872
 
Petz,

Re: 1, That just makes AMD's comments about Q1 being down due to seasonality all the more pathetic

Re: 2, "Tax loss selling" has very little to do with AMD being at $7 and change

Re: 3 & 4, undocumented? Huh?

The doom and gloom is warranted.



To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 5:48:04 PM
From: niceguy767Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Looks like AMD is looking at an $250M loss, before write offs...i.e. goodwill and intangibles. In a word: UGLY!

On the other hand, INTC is looking at a 5 point gross margin improvement and probably an $500M increment in revenues: record revenues and a quarterly eps of $0.38 minimum, before any one time write-offs.

Upshot: AMD looks pricey at $8.00 and INTC looks like a HUGE bargain at $25.60!



To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 5:58:49 PM
From: DRBESRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
does seem a bit over done does it not ?



To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 8:09:36 PM
From: Sarmad Y. HermizRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
re quibbles.

>> 1. Q1 CPU revenue vs. Q4 is on average UP 2% for the years 1999-2006

That's very surprising to me. Completely in the opposite direction of what I expect. I'll have to dig a little.

The figure I have seen is that of the total number of PC's sold in a year, 43% are sold in first half, and 57% are sold in second half. And that's where the expectations of seasonality come from.

In the case of AMD, at this time, There will be so many charges and writedowns, and changes in products that comparison will be difficult. For now, I'll reiterate my forecast of a large loss in the vicinity of $400m. Do you see a significantly smaller loss ? Maybe even a profit ?
-----------

>> 2. Tax loss selling is mostly over,

Not at all. year end tax selling by individuals will continue to the last day of the year.
----------

>> 3. virtualization performance penalty of 50%
The performance penalty on virtualization is undocumented.

Even if the penalty was small, no general purpose server manager will buy a processor with a known defect that occurs in a common application. People who already bought the chip will use the patch, because what choice do they have ? But new sales will be zero. Do you see any barc's in the market ?
----------

>> 4. It also appears consistent with them saying HPC work is not adversely affected.
Barcelona servers in HPC market don't use virtualization.
<<

That's exactly precisely, almost to the letter, what I said. Which is that AMD continues to sell barc to HPC customers because they do not use virtualization. Are you posting your response as a quibble, or affirmation ? Looks like agreement to me.



To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 8:43:43 PM
From: wbmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Q1 CPU revenue vs. Q4 is on average UP 2% for the years 1999-2006.

Petz, here is some data on that claim. I'd say most of the reason leading to a positive average had to do with AMD's growth period exiting year 2000, and a bit of recovery following their terrible 2002 4th quarter. Most other Q1 periods had small or negative growth. Q1 is typically a down seasonal quarter.

Q1 2007 - $918M (-38.2%)
Q4 2006 - $1,486M

Q1 2006 - $1,299M (-0.6%)
Q4 2005 - $1,307M

Q1 2005 - $750M (+2.7%)
Q4 2004 - $730M

Q1 2004 - $571M (-1.7%)
Q4 2003 - $581M

Q1 2003 - $468M (+11.4%)
Q4 2002 - $420M

Q1 2002 - $684M (-2.7%)
Q4 2001 - $703M

Q1 2001 - $661M (+16.8%)
Q4 2000 - $566M

Q1 2000 - $563M



To: Petz who wrote (244571)12/17/2007 9:12:42 PM
From: golfbumRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
this is mid december, tax loss selling by institutions has long since past.

i think the bottom (temporary) is around $5.

i thing the long term bottom is bk.

gb