Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (363456)	12/18/2007 2:10:55 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575146

"And OJ didn't kill two people because the gloves didn't fit and one of the investigating cops was caught making racist remarks." How do those things equate? Juries can be mislead. Sometimes they don't fully grasp the law, nor how to judge evidence. A judge is different. Now I realize you feel your legal training exceeds that of the judge, but...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (363456)	12/18/2007 8:28:06 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575146

CJ, > According to the judge, it wasn't relevant to the case. So, it wasn't perjury by definition. And OJ didn't kill two people because the gloves didn't fit and one of the investigating cops was caught making racist remarks. He was talking about Bill Clinton...so why do you bring up OJ? Oh that's right......its a distraction. BTW CJ was talking about a judge's decision; the decision on OJ came in a criminal trial in which a jury ruled there wasn't enough evidence. It would help when you setup strawmen to try and make apples to apples comparisons. TIA.