SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (13100)12/18/2007 2:45:33 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
All you guys that were praising Lieberman earlier this year now going to support McCain? <g>
___________________________________________-

McCain basks in ex-Dem Lieberman support By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer
Mon Dec 17, 11:22 PM ET


HILLSBOROUGH, N.H. - Republican John McCain is having quite a moment. He's rising in the polls. He's got major newspaper endorsements in Iowa and New Hampshire. And now he's getting help with this state's legions of independent voters from Joe Lieberman, the contrarian who was Democrat Al Gore's running mate in 2000.


"The Mac is Back," said a hand-painted sign on the wall of the packed American Legion post where Lieberman announced his endorsement on Monday, a newly optimistic tone after a bumpy campaign year for the Arizona senator.

The decision by the Senate's best-known independent to snub the Democratic Party could help McCain win a bigger share of the tide of independent voters who have been expected to flow to the Democratic field in New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary on Jan. 8.

Independents outnumber Republicans and Democrats here, and the state is key to McCain's hopes for the GOP nomination.

Support from a high-profile senator who almost always caucuses and votes with Democrats risks alienating conservative GOP voters, angry already at what they see as McCain's abandonment on immigration and campaign finance. Democratic leaders expressed their annoyance, too.

There was no doubt, however, about the Lieberman announcement's buzz effect — no small factor in a race now in the homestretch with a large field. The news injected energy and interest into the McCain campaign, still behind in the polls but glowing from a weekend of coveted newspaper endorsements: from The Des Moines Register in Iowa, where he is barely competing in the Jan. 3 caucuses but where he will return after Christmas as planned, as well as from The Boston Globe and The Portsmouth Herald — both influential in New Hampshire. He'd already been endorsed by The New Hampshire Union Leader.

McCain also seemingly has enough money to stage a more serious play for South Carolina. He announced Monday he is going on the radio there with a spot featuring the state's popular Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham — another of his Senate colleagues.

McCain's strategy, pared down after financial and organizational troubles earlier this year, now calls for winning New Hampshire and using that boost to lay claim to South Carolina.

Independents, who can vote in either party's primary in New Hampshire, are the wild card. They helped McCain beat George W. Bush here in 2000. McCain advisers are hoping for a repeat — but this time not followed by a loss in South Carolina and defeat for the nomination.

On the first day of a two-day Straight Talk Express tour through New Hampshire — McCain's second bus tour of the state in two weeks, he said "I do" when asked if he senses upward momentum. His crowds are bigger and more enthusiastic, his Internet hits more frequent and his poll numbers are rising, McCain said.

"But I am not an unbiased observer," he said, adding some realism.

"We have a long way to go," McCain said, aware that opinion polls still show him trailing far behind fellow Republican Mitt Romney in New Hampshire.

Roberta Adams and George Merrill, both undecided voters who drove from nearby Antrim to check out McCain, came away impressed but uncommitted. Merrill, a registered Republican, said New Hampshire's independent spirit means the endorsement by Lieberman not only doesn't hurt McCain with Republicans but helps.

"We're not voting for the party, we're voting for the man," Merrill said.

McCain said the support from an "independent Democrat," as the Connecticut senator calls himself, will answer the people who invariably ask him in town hall meetings, "Why can't you all work together?"

Lieberman reinforced the message. He said he chose his longtime Senate colleague as the best candidate of either party because of his national security credentials and because McCain has the best shot of breaking through partisan gridlock.

"You may not agree with John McCain on everything — I don't," Lieberman told those gathered in the American Legion hall. "But you can always count on him to be honest with you about where he stands and to stand where he honestly thinks it's best for our country."

Lieberman said he had planned to wait until after the primaries to make a 2008 pick, but changed his mind when McCain called — the only candidate, including fellow Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd who is running for president on the Democratic side, to do so.

Lieberman won re-election to the Senate in 2006 as an independent, after losing the Democratic primary to upstart Ned Lamont, largely because of Lieberman's support for the war.

Lamont said Monday, "It is now clear that Joe Lieberman is the one working to defeat our hopes."

Said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "I have the greatest respect for Joe, but I simply have to disagree with his decision to endorse Senator McCain."

In South Carolina, McCain backers had been growing restless as the campaign put most of its resources into TV ads in New Hampshire and all but planted the candidate there, save for a few days. Supporters pressed the campaign to send money south to show he hadn't abandoned the state. They apparently got their wish: A radio ad begins this week, focusing on McCain's position on Iraq and featuring Graham — an issue and a person close to the hearts of many South Carolina Republicans.

"I've been to Iraq nine times. The troop surge is working. Terrorists are on the run, and we need a president prepared to win," Graham says in the ad. "Only one candidate had the courage to call for the troop surge in spite of the polls, and that's John McCain."



To: pompsander who wrote (13100)12/18/2007 2:55:03 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
The Clinton camp believes that Obama and Edwards have gotten a free ride for the past month or so. Clinton's lieutenants and supporters note that while her campaign's attacks on Obama have been roundly criticized, it was Obama who joined Edwards in attacking Clinton first, at little cost.

This has forced the Clinton campaign to move aggressively on its own to raise a slew of questions about Obama's past. But some of these efforts backfired and suggested a campaign in panic. That was especially true of a statement by a Clinton operative about Obama's openly confessed drug use in his youth and the campaign's invocation of Obama's kindergarten jottings to show he had always harbored presidential ambitions.

Nonetheless, the Clinton campaign has had to continue to sow doubts about Obama. Former president Bill Clinton used "The Charlie Rose Show" on Friday to ask if Democrats were willing to "roll the dice" on a candidate with Obama's brief Washington experience. Earlier in the day, Hillary Clinton had said that with her candidacy, "There are no surprises."

Clinton's endorsement last weekend by the Des Moines Register was an important break because the paper echoed her closing argument.

Clinton, the Register concluded, was the candidate "best prepared to confront the enormous challenges the nation faces." Obama, it said, was "more inspirational," but "with his relative inexperience, it's hard to feel as confident he could accomplish the daunting agenda that lies ahead." Clinton hopes the endorsement will mark the campaign's next, and last, turning point.

The danger to Clinton, despite her lead in the national polls, is that a loss in Iowa on Jan. 3 could easily cascade into losses in New Hampshire on Jan. 8 and in South Carolina on Jan. 26. And while the Clinton camp would welcome an Edwards victory in Iowa as an alternative to an Obama win, it's now possible that Edwards could drive Clinton into third place.

Hillary Clinton's demanding task is to keep doubts about Obama high in the minds of Iowa voters while finding the dash of inspiration that has so far eluded her campaign. Achieving both objectives at the same time will be the greatest challenge of her political life.

postchat@aol.com

washingtonpost.com