SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (231971)12/19/2007 5:54:07 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793772
 
Big Brother is watching after you. Is this all beginning to sound like a POLICE STATE to anyone? I dont see how you can regulate any LEGAL drug out of a home. If cigarettes are so damn bad how come the govt doesnt put down the tobacco companies? Maybe the anti cigarette people ought to get a hotshot attorney and file a MASSIVE CLASS ACTION SUIT against the Federal government for LEGALIZING TOBACCO? jdn



To: LindyBill who wrote (231971)12/19/2007 3:29:37 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793772
 
I wouldn't approve of the government banning smoking in peoples own homes, but if the government bans smoking in their own housing that's different.

* * *



To: LindyBill who wrote (231971)12/19/2007 5:00:18 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793772
 
If Seattle liberals push poor smokers* out of public housing and they become homeless will they still blame Bush and the conservatives for them being homeless?

I think so.

*Smoking is much more prevalent among the poor and less educated:

Current smoking prevalence also was higher among adults living below the poverty level* (32.9%) than among those at or above the poverty level (22.2%).
...........
By education level, smoking prevalence was highest among adults who had earned a General Educational Development diploma (42.3%) and lowest among those with graduate degrees (7.2%).

cdc.gov