Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tech101 who wrote (24565)	12/19/2007 12:07:07 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 46821

I can't find the efficiency either. And they have said they are targeting $1 per renewable watt to achieve grid parity- while FSLR is currently at 1.15 and targeting .70. I have been hearing about Nanosolar for almost 4 years. Once companies miss their window it seems like they can't regain that lead. Not saying Nano won't be able to but it is difficult. the reason they couldn't ship last year or the year before was efficiency and yield- they were getting 6% like all CIGS, not good enough. They need 9% imho. FSLR is 10.5%. And of course silicon is much higher but thin film works better in the clouds. heres a startup really delivering out here ausra.com