Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (18671)	12/19/2007 3:27:15 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

You also fail to understand that common thought methods are more important for determining common outcomes than wearing common cloth styles. The point had nothing to do with common clothes styles. The point was that two groups having one or several similarities, does not mean the groups are similar as a whole. Very few of our complex system level theories in science are watertight when viewed from a rigid logic standpoint Very true. But predictions of future global temperatures go far beyond not being watertight. With evolution, you don't seem to see the logical holes, or don't worry about them. But with climate science, the logical holes are all you see. I see holes the size of the grand canyon easier than I see holes small enough for me to have dug myself.