Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (18681)	12/19/2007 4:24:58 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 36921

My arguments that creationists & AGW deniers are similar is based on the very strong facts that they use identical methods and tactics wrt to science. To the extent the tactics is valid (and some of the tactics used by each group are), then its irrelevant if their the same. You would only have a point if they both used the same exact list of invalid tactics and illogical arguments. And even than it would be a weak point. Why don't you see the holes in evolution? I do. They are much bigger. No they aren't. Esp. since I'm talking about future predictions of climate. We can argue whether the general understanding of climate processes or the general understanding of evolution is more full of holes. But future predictions of climate (or predictions of future evolution for that matter) are much more full of holes than either.