Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (18685)	12/19/2007 4:29:51 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

I side with both evolution and AGW, as the science behind each is rock solid The broad science behind AGW is not rock solid. Edit - If by "broad science behind AGW", you mean the scientific conclusion that the earth is warming, primarily because of human emissions of CO2, and that the temperature rises will continue. If you can't tell that I'm bashing evolution in selected posts to play devils advocate to get you thinking, you are hopeless. If your playing devil's advocate about evolution fine. That would mean your expecting counter arguments about evolution, and if they can overcome your objections the idea will be shown to be more valid. But playing devils advocate about evolution doesn't make sense as part of an argument for severe and continuing human caused global warming.