Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (18688)	12/19/2007 7:30:02 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

You have a problem understanding what science is and is not. What you did agree with, is that the methods and values placed on methods used by creationists and AGW bashers are in fact the same. What I'm saying is that those methods are in fact the problem that befuddles individuals like yourself. When a scientist like Lindzen behaves in a certain way on AGW, he is doing the exact same thing that a scientist like Behe does wrt to evolution. And you have no knowledge or skill to determine if one of them is out to lunch while the other is not. They are both out to lunch for the same reason. Yet you blissfully think only one of them is, and in fact, you have admitted in a prior post that you are clueless regarding any metric that might help you to differentiate between the two cases. Fine. Work on getting a clue.