Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (232080)	12/19/2007 6:05:58 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

This is true, but if Mullah Omar wouldn't give free reign of the country to Osama bin Laden, who attacked us first, the Talibs would still be in power. Their women would not vote, and they would still starve - because they were not allowed to hold paying jobs. Once we went to war and removed the Talibs, things changed, as different groups came to rule the country. I think D'Souza is trying to make some sort of an anti-Liberal argument, but "blowback" theories can only lead in a very wrong headed direction.