Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Free Float Trading/ Portfolio Development/ Index Stategies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dvdw© who wrote (2280)	12/20/2007 11:30:27 AM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 3821

Many of our systemic views are clear in the article to which this is a reply. The details surrounding current market conditions are in part directly attributable to the underlying assumptions of the hedge community. Even though there is diversity in the plans and tactics, the large degree of sameness of the varied funds, speaks to one thing....inertia. Inertia, as we well know is a symptom of accumulated bets, inertia becomes the prevailing condition when sameness bumps into the reality of supply as a relative constant. Hedge Objectives cant be met, when a state of inertia emerges in any particular security. We see zone 1's in this state routinely as ownership; has not responded to the tactical programs intent. oila inertia. In the absence of regulation of tactical programs to fundamental security issuance law, supply and demand is disconnected. The suspension of first principle law in favor of aims of systems operating under a flawed understanding, that all other owners of any given security, might not capitulate to program goals, speaks to the ill construction of an applied theory, thereby reducing the potential of a given program,from one which was designed for yield, to one which actually delivers losses, not gains. . its becoming clearer by the day........ Having read and presumably understood these two pieces what % of the market do you now see as being systemic.......Hmmmm?