Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (54440)	12/20/2007 12:13:09 PM
From: Nostradameus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

Market is already paying for around 2.8 m oz at approx. 60 $ for ressources.....I don't know the cash or other projects though.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (54440)	12/20/2007 12:43:05 PM
From: ogi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

Thank You Claude, Now in at , 1.95, 2.25, 3.30 I very much like what I have seen so far, especially: -Plus 1 g/t over impressive lengths, not sure of true width but good -Grade from surface = low strip = less expensive mine - extensive oxidization = higher initial recoveries=lower mining costs = fast cheaper recovery of Capex -Sulphides at depth suggest size and greater long life of mine potential -Large property, with geophysics and trenching matching drill results so far = higher chance of continued good drill results. -Share price behaviour acting positively. Cheers, Ogi