Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (18780)	12/21/2007 5:23:55 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Neo, making up what other people think is no argument. You should stick to what people actually say rather than inventing things they didn't. Read the rest of it and forget about what you imagined that you read. Mqurice

To: neolib who wrote (18780)	12/22/2007 11:12:03 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

"THERE IS NO LINK BETWEEN THE RATE OF INCREASE OR DECREASE SEEN IN THE ANNUAL CYCLE AND THE RATE OF INCREASE OR DECREASE OF THE LONGER TERM TREND." Now that is really stupid. Total lack of process comprehension. As the ppm of CO2 long term increases all biologicals that grow with CO2 would grow more and more would die with the seasons. thus there is a bias to increase the amplitude of the short term or annual variation. Does neolib support the whart rat lie that the science and suppositions of junkscience.com have been debunked over and over again.