Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (252122)	12/22/2007 9:41:29 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Dont be so smug Wharf. It doesnt befit you. I think that there are many views on this and the science is not always clear or 100% accurate. Thats why we have a Creator or a Spaceman or the myth thereof out there to look too. Ruffian proved yesterday that man is limited and just a tad removed from the ape, at least in his case. Maybe we find out the truth when we die. Maybe we never do. What i object to about nadine is not her view on Global Warming but here adherence to a right wing/neocon/bush admin line. Can we find one issue in which she disagrees with this admin? She is too smart not to be inquisitive. Michael savage she is not. Merry Christmas to the thread. Have a great holiday and i will check in every once in awhile if i get a minute. WR--see you at the chinese restarant on Tuesday? Beer or white wine?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (252122)	12/22/2007 12:34:57 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Wharfie, the last time you called me scientifically illiterate, it was on top of a paper on sea level rise you cited as proof of imminent climate change disaster. When I read that paper, it said that sea level was rising at a rate different from the predictions of the models, and the authors did not understand why! This was the "proof of disaster"! Then there were the prolonged attempts to deny the existence of a medieval warm period, or to claim in was only a localized European phenomenon. Many further studies are putting the lie to that claim. The MWP existed. The Little Ice Age existed too. I may not have an advanced degree in science, but I can read. So can all the PhDs in climatology who are now on record as skeptics of the global warming hysteria package. This appeal gratuitous insult only weakens your case.