SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252180)12/24/2007 1:22:22 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"would an international global warming crisis be politically useful to this crowd?

From there, all you have to observe is the same crowd attempting the to apply the same concepts of 'fairness' as group redress using the wonderful new tool of global warming, where 'pollution' is redefined to mean only the use of energy by the developed world, not actual pollutants or energy inefficiency."

Ocham's razor says yes.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252180)12/26/2007 7:32:47 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 281500
 
Just look at fonte's definitions and ask yourself, would an international global warming crisis be politically useful to this crowd?

It's a conspiracy, Nadine. Round up the usual suspects.

It never ceases to amaze how astonishingly, completely, comprehensively full of crap you are.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (252180)12/26/2007 9:35:20 AM
From: c.hinton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I suppose its about as usefull as alleged wmd....

but nadine, it would seem that the tide of american opinion is turning against that which you hold so dear....that is ,our god given right to pollute.

ps perhaps it might help your cause to call enviromentalists anti semites.ng