Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (72748)	12/24/2007 2:23:46 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

However, when the Fed sets the discount rate at 1%, keeps it there for a year or more, and implies that it's going to stay low for a while, then banks can borrow short, lend long, and essentially coin profits with little, if any, risk. That's the way the Fed uses to indirectly issue money to the banks. It's not going to be different this time. If things become dire later in 2008, I expect the Fed funds to dip to around 2% or less and stay there for a while. No risk? Hardly Look at Citigroup, Countrywide, the aftermath of 2 million foreclosures, rising credit card defaults, Morgan Stanley, MBIA, Ambac, etc etc etc. I agree the Fed will lower rates again but banks are so impaired and consumers so loaded up with debt that there will not be the takers we saw the last time. The Fed created a housing bubble and that housing bubble created jobs. Everyone THOUGHT there was no risk in borrowing short to lend long. They all thought WRONG. There will not be another housing bubble. Instead Commercial real estate is going to implode making banks all the more reluctant to lend. Jobs are one of the keys. Show me the jobs and show me rising wages enough to matter (and not just at the top end either) Mish