SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John McCarthy who wrote (72807)12/26/2007 8:27:05 AM
From: Mike Johnston  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
This is what i am saying up to d)

It is uncertain what would exactly happen in e) and later, it is clear that the Fed would have to peg long rates, but this is not a stretch to imagine, because the whole thing would have happened for the exact reason that they want to peg rates in the first place, because China dumping $450 billion worth of Treasuries would cause significant increase in rates.

The delay would be designed to allow China to get rid of $450 billion and avoid others front running them into gold market or other hard asset or currency markets.

Of course this is recipe for very high inflation and possibly hyperinflation.
Although i do not believe hyperinflation is imminent at this point, i believe it is likely, in fact i expect annual inflation to hit 20%-25% by 2009 and then 40-50% in the following years.



To: John McCarthy who wrote (72807)12/26/2007 8:39:38 AM
From: Mike Johnston  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
Regarding e)

As crazy as it sounds, since bond vigilantes are either dead, put out of business or lost their analytical abilities, it would not surprise me in this environment if the whole operation would be interpreted as bullish for bonds. -g-

Sounds crazy, but so is 4% 10 yr bond yield with price and monetary inflation spinning out of control.