Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18995)	12/27/2007 12:29:26 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

Maurice likes to argue, which leads him to play dense. When he rambled on half a dozen posts about the rate of CO2 absorbtion during NH spring all the while hinting this was somehow relevant to GW, it makes me wonder. Then he finaly turns 180 and claims he knows that plants are not the issue and that he knew all about the oceans yea many a year ago. Most of the bashers can't look realistically at almost any single element of the problem. On the other hand most of those who understand the science have no problem conceding any point which has good backing. Why should they? Dierks is in llalla land, confusing economics with science. For aught I know, Mikey Crichton does write peer reviewed Sci-Fi. What is that?