Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (252562)	12/28/2007 4:59:05 PM
From: Lou Weed	Respond to of 281500

Thanks for your well thought out reply. I agree with you with regards to the banter back and forth on SI with regards to GW. Isn't it ironic that GW is now the acronym that we are all using for global warming?!? My personal feeling is that we need to be very careful with our treatment of the planet so for me its an important issue. Lets face it, no matter what side of the debate you're on we haven't been and still aren't diligent in our handling of our planet's air and water supply. Its a duty to our future generations in my opinion to keep it as clean as possible even if you don't believe that pollution is accelerating GW. What I find fascinating is that I'm learning that the folks who are against curtailing emissions for the sake of economics are the very same ones who have no problem pouring 100s of billions of dollars into endless wars. Only fractions of that expenditure would go a long way to reducing our polluting ways.