SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (10439)12/29/2007 11:42:02 AM
From: CapitalistHogg™Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
sea levels would be a concern.

but how can the scientists be certain the rise will be that significant?

couldn't the water be redistributed to the land via thunderstorms? or perhaps some other dynamic?



To: ahhaha who wrote (10439)12/29/2007 11:50:07 AM
From: neolibRespond to of 24758
 
I think global warming is a great thing. Why would anyone believe otherwise?

No everyone who owns a shack on a tropical beach fancies the idea of watching the surf from below.



To: ahhaha who wrote (10439)1/3/2008 1:20:49 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
Geeze, given the blast of polar air that the computer models predicted couldn't happen, all you global tree huggers better get out your oil burning stoves for the express purpose of preparing for the cold, especially on the east coast. You think you got it bad now? It's blizzard time. You have have about 72 hours to prepare. And make sure you cut down that heritage tree that the socialists won't let you touch. You'll need it when the oil runs out.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News