Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (252595)	12/29/2007 5:12:55 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

nadine it would seem that your main obgection is to the approach to co2.......or am i wrong in believing your are ok with conservation and anti pollution measures and alternative energy supplies(solar in particular)? I am certainly okay with factually-based approaches to combatting pollution or decrease dependency on Mideast oil. My problem with the GW hysteria is that such a hysteria does just the opposite of giving an "impetus" to any of these things. On the contrary, it will waste billions of dollars in a vain effort to combat a problem that we haven't even proven actually exists, and we cannot effectively combat even if it does exist. This kind of "impetus" will do nothing productive and much that is counter-productive. Meantime, resources being finite, many real problems that are killing people by the millions here and now will go unadressed.