Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (27056)	12/30/2007 3:52:59 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217917

TJ, it's up to India how they stop invading Tibetans, and how the USA stops invading Mexicans. It's not for Mexico's or Tibet's or China's bosses to shoot people in the back who try to escape. It's up to the place where they are going. There is no need for war between the countries. Stopping unarmed or lightly armed Mexicans or Tibetans isn't very difficult for India and the USA. The USA could stop it by the declaration of invaders as being fair game, open season, body parts salable to the highest bidder. As I mentioned, the NRA could rally a quorum of "well regulated militia, keeping and bearing arms" who could deal with the problem easily. India could do the same. It amazes me that you can draw such absurd conclusions from what I've written. <yet you are advocating that tibetans be allowed to enter india at will, thus in fact advocating for war > Mqurice PS: Basketball hoop is installed, works well, and the summery day was wonderful. No Tibetan, Chinese, Mexican or other invaders evident. In fact, very few people at all were evident as they have all decamped Auckland for beach and other vacation spots. School holidays are on. The streets are almost deserted. It's great.