SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TARADO96 who wrote (4602)12/30/2007 6:20:54 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Respond to of 149317
 
Let the people decide via their vote. If people think it is serious, they will not vote for her.



To: TARADO96 who wrote (4602)12/30/2007 7:29:09 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 149317
 
Quit BS'ing about Hillary and Edwards. You give Obama a bad name. The only major difference I see between any of the three is stylistic, plus electability counts big-time. Polls prove Edwards is the most electable and the only one who can steal red states from the GOP in the general election.

I will support whomever Dems nominate, but if it's Hillary or Obama expect it to be another close election that comes down to Ohio and Florida, and though Ohio is now in Dem hands, I don't trust the GOP in Florida one bit. They cheat. They've stolen two elections in a row in those two states. SO why give them the opportunity to try it again?

You cannot name one red state either Obama or Hillary have a realistic chance of carrying, and they would both probably lose New Hampshire to Romney.



To: TARADO96 who wrote (4602)12/30/2007 9:13:53 PM
From: zeta1961  Respond to of 149317
 
I think it's serious to the extent that she's either lying in today's interview and the press(George S their former aide) didn't call her on it or she's telling the truth and therefore broke the law...but again, the press probably won't make enuff of an issue for the American people to know about it to make an informed choice..heck, there's so much in her/Bill's dossier that should disqualify them..you can be darn sure that the GOP opp research teams put today's clip in their library sized filing cabinet..

A reason that Edwards and the second tier candidates tick me off sometimes..they've been all too willing to splinter the Anti-Hillary vote..ego before truth and justice and what's good for America..but, but, let's see what deals happen on Jan 03 before I judge them too harshly...



To: TARADO96 who wrote (4602)12/31/2007 10:00:22 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
Security clearances are an executive branch action; being the Chief Executive a sitting President can share anything he wants with anyone he deems prudent and necessary or desirable.

It's only a crime if someone accesses classified information without executive authority. Even reading classified info is not a crime for someone without a clearance if they didn't procure it themselves. Reporters get stuff all the time.