Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zeta1961 who wrote (4663)	12/31/2007 5:37:53 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 149317

Nosense. Edwards is a very strong candidate perfectly capable of beating Hillary for the nomination. The Clinton machine is like any other machine. It collapses if the candidate does not win. Remember the Dean, Gephardt and Lieberman "machines" in 2004. Between them they didn't do jack. But Edwards did. Edwards' hypocrisy? About what? He's leading now in Iowa despite spending 25% of what Hillary and Obama have spent. And yes the Unions are helping Edwards now but that is a good thing. GOP voters helping Hillary? Not in the dem causes they aren't. It's true the GOP doesn't want to run against Edwards and would much prefer Obama or Hillary (they're not sure which they'd like more yet), but the GOP voters have their own set of problems and are focused on their own race with is razor thin in Iowa and New Hampshire both. You will see in a few days what I am talking about, and soon understand why is is mandatory for all democrats to unite around Edwards. To win, my friend, to win. To beat Mitt Romney by a landslide. That is what it's all about. And if Obama could do it I'd be behind him, but he can't. Obama won't win a single red state, not even close. It would be another squeaker (or worse) with Obama, or Hillary. Don't underestimate Mitt Romney. He is the perfect patrician type and he looks great on TV.