Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kyungha who wrote (72816)	12/31/2007 11:41:04 PM
From: kyungha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196876

5,657,317 issued on 8-12-1997; patft.uspto.gov 6,389,010 issued on 5-14-002; patft.uspto.gov Injunction justified? Not overboard? Disappointed. Q may not have work around for one issued in 2005. Injunction should be voided on appeal. Q wanted to pay three times as much of ordinary rate to use them. Now, injunction for what reason? Court is biased to destroy industry. What should Q do? Any cards beside WCDMA patent which is not going to do anything unless given pass through right? Q will never give pass thru right to any body.