SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (72874)1/1/2008 12:49:01 PM
From: peterk  Respond to of 196851
 
JeffreyHF- Only one claim of the 686 patent was infringed so it may be easier to workaround the one claim. However it also means that Q wasn't infringing on at least 2 of the claims and possibly more.



To: JeffreyHF who wrote (72874)1/1/2008 2:14:24 PM
From: BoonDoggler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196851
 
FRAND
So perhaps for OFDM, Q should refuse to sit in on any LTE standards setting meetings, let everyone be aware that any OFDM standard will require use of Q's OFDM patents, and refuse to be bound by FRANDly obligations. Then charge 4 - 6 % for each patent. Shut down any possibility of LTE getting off the ground.
As soon as you agree to FRAND, you can be held hostage by sleaze balls taking advantage of this asinine system we have in place.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News