Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mindykoeppel who wrote (72940)	1/2/2008 9:21:50 AM
From: kyungha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196961

Die BRCM, just die BRCM, whose mantra was it?

To: mindykoeppel who wrote (72940)	1/2/2008 9:24:13 AM
From: mindykoeppel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196961

Verizon is a special case because of their license agreement with BRCM. Judge will comment further on Verizon. Q had no idea who the second carrier was who was supposed to have signed an agreement with BRCM and whether that agreement was only for the ITC infringement or included the Santa Ana infringement. Qualcomm was going do everything it can as expeditiously as possible to seek a stay, appeal this judge's injunction et. Qualcomm was also going to appeal the jury decision from May 2007 on the validity of those three patents and the infringement itself in the jury's original finding.