Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (365072)	1/2/2008 5:35:33 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1571698

No, if there were such proof, the Democrats could impeach Bush. They know they don't have grounds so they are sanely backing off from that. Unfortunately, the insane parts of the base (see your closest mirror) don't understand that.

To: American Spirit who wrote (365072)	1/2/2008 5:42:01 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1571698

Democrats could impeach Bush, and Bush deserves it many times over, but they mad a calculated decision not to, maybe because Bush only had two years left. <aybe because all the Repubs who led Whitewater were booted out of office afterward. A third reason might have been to avoiding having a sitting GOP president running for re-election. And of course Cheney would have to be indicted and booted out first. Nobody wants Cheney as president except the real fascists. As bad as Bush is, Cheney is worse. All of the above are valid reasons but a real shame. We would be a much stronger democracy if we showed we're still able to boot out our most corrupt presidents. Oh yeah, I believe impeachment also takes something like a two-thirds vote, so Dems alone wouldn't be able to do it. So blame the GOP too. This is the #1 reason along with our troops not being brought home that congress is so unpopular.