Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SeachRE who wrote (111663)	1/4/2008 1:22:28 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

its the truth, and Guiliani was absolutely right to avoid Iowa. Romney is probably destroyed now. I think a dem will win in 08, and I like all dem candidates. But on the republican side both Guiliani and Romney are decent. There is no chance we get anybody as bad as bush again, he is the worst president of all time. But leave it to Iowa to vote in a Baptist minister Huckabee. For gods sake. On cspan they said Iowa has an older population than the norm, well duh whatever their views are are outdated. The NY times has a lot of coverage on Iowa on their blogs and 90% of the posts are saying exactly the same thing. States like Iowa are why we have Bush who started useless wars and doubled the national debt in only 8 years. we can't have people this stupid picking the president. I doubt NH or any meaningful states follow through with Iowa and the big states have moved up to a point where Iowa might be moot. If it is not, then I predict CA will move up to where Iowa is in 2012. The big states are pissed off.