Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (24657)	1/5/2008 11:34:07 AM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Peter, The stockholders of any TV site are not about cause any bumps in the road than might cause a problem for their profits. In their eyes that is more important than the truth.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (24657)	1/6/2008 6:37:35 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 71588

Guess what everybody, good news! The White House says it is interested in increasing its efforts to capture or kill Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri. Might as well, huh, they did attack America after all. I know Saddam Hussien was a threat with his WMDs and all, but gees, ABL and Zawahri really did murder thousands of innocent Americans, so I'd give them priority too. But hold on, maybe we should go after Syria, because I hear Saddam Hussein moved all his WMDs there, so that makes Syria the same threat to America as Saddam Hussein, or does it? If it was me, I'd have gone after OBL and his gang first, bury them under a ton of bombs, that's what I would have done. Those bastard attacked us, not Saddam Hussien. Peter, can you tell me why Saddam Hussein took precedent over OBL? Because, really, I don't get it.