SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justin C who wrote (233917)1/7/2008 1:40:36 PM
From: MichaelSkyy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793838
 
He answered me after I forwarded your post to him:

Merry Christmas
--- "Nuze, Nealz (CXR-Atlanta)"
<nealz.nuze@CoxRadio.com> wrote:

>
> Do you know how many times we've had to deal with
> this absurd challenge?
>
> Read the book!

>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mikesky@yahoo.com [mailto:mikesky@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tue 12/25/2007 2:03 PM
> To: Nuze, Nealz (CXR-Atlanta)
> Subject: Fairtax or 'double-tax' (from
> boortz.com/boortz)
>
> Tue Dec 25 14:03:02 EST 2007
> The following form was submitted from
> boortz.com/boortz:
>
> Subject: Fairtax or 'double-tax'
> Name: mike
> Email: mikesky@yahoo.com
>
> Message:
> From a message board:
>
>
>
> There's a significant problem with this concept
> that's rarely mentioned. If a 23% national sales tax
> were enacted, the portion of one's assets (cash,
> investments, etc.) that were acquired with
> after-federal-income-tax dollars would be taxed
> again when liquidated and used to purchase
> federal-sales-taxable items, resulting in double
> taxation, which would be an "unfair tax". I once
> emailed the Fair Tax group asking how the double tax
> would be avoided, and they declined to address the
> problem. A local Rupublican operative told me a
> national sales tax will never happen unless the
> double taxation issue is addressed.