SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (19417)1/19/2008 8:42:30 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
We can model most of the major contribution in climate science with a reasonable numerical accuracy.

The numbers can add up very accurately in the models, that doesn't mean they accurately reflect reality.



To: neolib who wrote (19417)1/20/2008 12:50:45 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 36921
 
poor poor neolib living an a world with the tooth fairy. 99.99999999% of the details are missing in creating models that predict climate change and it's possible effects on daily weather or seasons.

Weather men cannot even predict snowfall amounts within 50% for 12 hours ahead almost all the time.

once more revealed neolib, +99% ear2earfeces.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News