SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Major League Baseball (MLB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (5956)1/8/2008 1:23:20 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 29250
 
Clemens, Channeling Bonds, Tortures Us, Truth: Commentary by Scott Soshnick

Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) -- So far Roger Clemens has been free to deny, deny, deny. Looking disingenuous is about the only consequence of his defiant assertion that great pitching and superhuman longevity were the result of nothing more than hard work and dedication.

The Clemens-is-clean routine soon may come with serious consequences.

The seven-time Cy Young Award winner has repeatedly attacked former Senator George Mitchell's illuminating report on performance-enhancing drugs in baseball. He also labeled as a liar -- and filed suit against -- Brian McNamee, the trainer who, under threat of jail time, told Mitchell that he, on several occasions, injected Clemens with steroids and human growth hormone.

McNamee told Mitchell that he -- and here's where things get sticky for Clemens -- also injected Clemens's Yankee teammate Andy Pettitte, who has since admitted taking HGH in order to recover more quickly from injury.

It's fair to ask why McNamee would be telling the truth about Pettitte and making up tales about Clemens, who, when it comes to legacy, has more to lose than any other player mentioned in the Mitchell report.

Clemens, through his attorney, issued a statement denying the use of performance-enhancing drugs. He could have left it at that. He didn't. What followed was another statement via his agent. And then a video on his Web site.

Borrowing From Bonds

He tried to let it all hang out on Sunday night in a chat with Mike Wallace on ``60 Minutes,'' with Clemens saying he did, indeed, receive injections from McNamee, only what McNamee says were steroids and HGH were, in fact, vitamin B-12 and lidocaine. Clemens told Wallace that McNamee's version is ``hogwash.''

``Let me be clear here,'' Clemens said, ``I did not use steroids and human growth hormone, and I've never done so.''

What we've got is disgraced slugger Barry Bonds all over again. In essence, Clemens is saying that if he did take steroids he didn't know he was taking steroids, the same line Bonds has used.

``He's playing a very dangerous game by going after his accuser in such a high profile way,'' says Matt Traub, a crisis management expert with Dan Klores Communications in New York.

Dangerous, indeed, and here's why: The Rocket, as he's known, has riled some pretty powerful folks, the kind who issue subpoenas.

Last week, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform invited Clemens to raise his right hand and tell the truth about the use of performance-enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball.

Attracting Attention

And now, according to Newsday, which cites a person familiar with the situation that it didn't identify, Clemens has attracted the attention of Jeff Novitzky, the Internal Revenue Service special agent responsible for 1) the indictment of Bonds on felony charges of perjury and obstruction of justice and 2) an admission of steroid use by track star Marion Jones.

Make no mistake, it isn't easy sitting across from Wallace, who has grilled, among others, Louis Farrakhan, Lyndon Johnson, Manuel Noriega and, the one that sticks out most in my mind, the Ayatollah Khomeini.

Nevertheless, there are no risks in lying to him.

Fibbing before Congress, or to Novitzky, should he get a crack at Clemens, can land you behind bars. Clemens said he intends to appear before lawmakers, who will hear from baseball and union officials, as well as players, next week.

``I'm going to Congress and I'm telling the truth,'' a testy Clemens said at a press conference yesterday, at one point taking a verbal poke at the assembled media by asking if it was OK for him to drink water.

McGwire Repeat

Clemens, you have to suspect, wants to avoid a repeat of Mark McGwire's pathetic performance before Congress in 2005, the one where baseball's Paul Bunyan took what became referred to as the fourth-and-a-half amendment. McGwire wouldn't answer questions about his alleged steroid use, instead, again and again, meekly telling lawmakers he wasn't interested in talking about his past.

Frankly, watching Saturday night's debate among the presidential hopefuls in New Hampshire makes it painfully obvious that Congress has more important things to do than worry about baseball and steroids.

Since lawmakers are already involved, though, they might as well get the truth.

Says Traub, the crisis management expert, of Clemens, ``if he continues this approach, unless there's some concrete evidence clearing him, he'll be remembered for and defined by his transgressions first and his achievements second. Just like Barry Bonds.''

Clemens yesterday played a recorded telephone conversation with McNamee, who never once said he lied to Mitchell.

So now all that's left is for Clemens to sit before the committee, raise his flamethrower of a right hand and swear to tell the truth. All while knowing his words, for the first time, come with consequences more severe than appearing disingenuous.

Last Updated: January 8, 2008 00:19 EST



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (5956)1/8/2008 2:49:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 29250
 
The Rocket's red glare

capecodonline.com

By Rob Duca / January 08, 2008

Believe him or not, consider him a victim or a shameless liar, you've got to give Roger Clemens credit: He's not going down quietly.

There'll be no Mark McGwire-type refusals to talk about the past. The Rocket isn't riding gently into the sunset. Instead, he's answering the heat with some of his own.

Sunday night, shortly after his impassioned plea of innocence during a "60 Minutes" interview was aired, Clemens filed a defamation suit against Brian McNamee, the former trainer who alleges to have injected the Rocket with performance-enhancing drugs.

Yesterday afternoon, Clemens again went on the attack at a press conference in Houston. It was quite a show.

Combative. Defensive. Disgusted. Agitated. Clemens was all that and more, stepping to the podium to answer questions and saying with contempt, "Some of you in the audience I'm uncomfortable even looking at, but I'll try and rise above it."

He did not rise above it. What's the line from The Beatles' song, "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill?"

If looks could kill it would have been us instead of him.

At one point, as Clemens spiced his answers with curses on live television, his lawyer, Rusty Hardin, passed him a note reading "Lighten up." Clemens read the note out loud, and went back into raging bull mode.

He told writers who held a Hall of Fame vote where they could stick their vote. He asked, "How do you prove a negative?"

Not long after, he said, "I've said enough," and stormed off the stage.

OK, we know Roger is pissed as hell. But we have no further evidence that he's innocent. Someone should tell Clemens that rage does not equal a convincing argument.

The supposed newsworthy aspect of the press conference came before Clemens spoke, when a tape was played of a 17-minute phone conversation Clemens had with his accuser last Friday night. But all the tape did was further muddy the waters.

Who's telling the truth? Who's lying? The tape didn't help.

An emotional McNamee apologized to Clemens, saying "I'm sorry that your family is going through this."

But he never said he lied about injecting Clemens with steroids. And he had plenty of opportunities.

Repeatedly, he asked Clemens, "What do you want me to do?"

But Clemens never shouted, "Get down here and tell the damn truth."

Isn't that how an outraged innocent person would respond? Instead, Clemens failed to answer in forceful terms, finally ending the conversation by saying he would talk to "some people" and get back to McNamee.

Throughout, they both danced around the subject of whether or not Clemens took steroids. It was unsettling and unsatisfying. And it proved nothing.

Clemens' campaign to restore his shredded image has been carefully crafted. When the Mitchell Report first broke last month, his lawyers issued immediate denials that essentially said Clemens was shocked and chagrined, mortified and stupefied. Clemens then went all 21st century on us with a YouTube video. On Sunday night, there was "60 Minutes" and yesterday afternoon he held the press conference.

What? No sit-down with Barbara Walters?

Now he's filed suit and he said he'll answer all questions under oath before Congress next Wednesday. But he won't submit to a polygraph. His lawyer squashed that notion yesterday.

Basically, here is Clemens' defense: He didn't do steroids.

Faced with every McNamee accusation, his response has been, "Totally false. Didn't happen."

When asked why McNamee would tell the truth about close friend and workout partner, Andy Pettitte, but lie about him, Clemens labeled the cases "totally separate."

So we are to believe that Pettitte was doing it, and Roger was completely unaware of that fact — while McNamee was trainer to both players?

Right.

After stating in his YouTube video that McNamee never injected him with anything, Clemens now says that the trainer injected him with the painkiller lidocaine and vitamin B-12. So if he was lying initially, why are we to believe him now? And are we to accept that McNamee did not know what he was injecting into Clemens, which is what Clemens maintains?

When the Mitchell Report came out Dec. 13, the case against Clemens looked like a no-brainer. His body clearly changed as he grew older, even though Clemens insisted Sunday night that it hadn't. He was stronger, more muscular, and he was still firing fastballs in the 90s when he was in his 40s.

When Pettitte admitted that McNamee had given him human growth hormone — as stated in the Mitchell Report — Clemens' protests of innocence rang hollow.

The Rocket is fighting back, hoping to turn the tide of public opinion in his favor. It's just not working.

And when he whined to Wallace, "It's hogwash for people to even assume this. Twenty-four, 25 years, Mike. You'd think I'd get an inch of respect. An inch," he simply appeared foolish.

His denials are difficult to swallow. Clemens hasn't offered much of a defense, other than we should give him the benefit of the doubt based on his seven Cy Young Awards and 354 wins.

But the public wants to be certain of how he accumulated those seven Cy Youngs and 354 wins.

We might learn the truth if the lawsuit makes it to court or if Clemens and McNamee appear before Congress. Or not.

Unfortunately, the one statement that possibly rang truest on Sunday night was when Clemens said, "I don't know if I can defend myself. I think people, a lot of people have already made their decisions."

Absent something more convincing from the Rocket than angry, curse-filled press conferences, he will have a tough time changing those minds.

Staff writer Rob Duca can be reached at 508-862-1177 or rduca@capecodonline.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (5956)1/9/2008 1:38:03 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 29250
 
Pettitte Plays A Pivotal Role For Clemens
_________________________________________________________

By MURRAY CHASS
Columnist
The New York Times
January 9, 2008

On the day that Rich Gossage deservedly gained entry to the Hall of Fame, I thought it would be appropriate to create the Hall of Infamy. Charter members: Pete Rose, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mark McGwire.

All right, only Rose has admitted doing what he was accused of — betting on baseball games — and it took him 15 years to make that admission. But McGwire’s shameful performance at a Congressional hearing nearly three years ago invited a presumption of guilt, and the circumstantial evidence is strong against Bonds and Clemens. Gossage himself pointed to some of that evidence yesterday.

“I think they are on the same level,” he said on a conference call in response to a question about Clemens and Bonds. “I don’t think there’s any question about it. I think that it’s kind of weird that these guys had some of their most productive years when guys in the history of the game, their talents were diminishing as they got older. And, these guys, it didn’t happen that way.”

Bonds and Clemens have steadfastly denied they used performance-enhancing drugs, but their denials have not convinced many of their innocence. Both players have emphasized the impact of their workout regimens on their playing productivity, but Gossage scoffed at that explanation.

“I know what workout regimens do,” he said.

The only difference between Clemens and Bonds is in the excuses, or explanations, they have offered.

Bonds said he used flaxseed oil and arthritic balm and didn’t know that the substances were actually steroids. That’s why he faces trial on perjury charges. The government said he knew they were steroids. Clemens, in his initial denials of the allegations in the Mitchell report, said nothing about getting shots.

But then he belatedly remembered that he had received shots of the painkiller lidocaine and the vitamin B12. It was interesting that Clemens wasn’t satisfied with saying he was injected with just one substance. He duplicated Bonds and named two substances that he used.

It was also interesting that he invoked B12, for two reasons:

That was what Rafael Palmeiro said Miguel Tejada gave him in 2005, suggesting that a tainted B12 sample led to his positive test for steroids.

Also, players traveling between the United States and Latin America are said to label their containers of steroids and human growth hormone as B12 to get them through customs.

No interviewer, not Mike Wallace of “60 Minutes” or any of the reporters who attended the Clemens news conference Monday, asked him if he had prescriptions for lidocaine and injectable B12. If he didn’t, he used them illegally. If he did have a prescription, why didn’t he have the doctor who prescribed them give him the shots? If not the doctor, why not the team trainer? Why his personal trainer?

Many other questions could be raised. For example, when Brian McNamee, his former trainer, asked him repeatedly during their telephone conversation last Friday, “What do you want me to do?” why didn’t Clemens tell him: “Just tell the truth: I didn’t take steroids.”

The problem is McNamee might have responded, “I have told the truth, Roger, and you know it.”

In the view of a New York criminal defense lawyer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity: “If you are purer than the driven snow, you fear no response. You ask only for an honest and truthful exoneration.”

Exoneration or conviction could come next Wednesday at a scheduled Congressional hearing. If Clemens and McNamee stick to their stories, one of them will be lying under oath. The key to the conflict is Andy Pettitte.

Pettitte, former teammate and workout partner of Clemens, has admitted using human growth hormone with McNamee, as the Mitchell report said. Pettitte’s admission bolsters McNamee’s credibility.

Clemens said he had no knowledge of what Pettitte was doing, but that is difficult to believe. In their relationship, Pettitte was the little brother, the puppy dog, who followed big brother and copied everything he did. There seems to be no way Pettitte would have used H.G.H. without discussing it with his role model.

Pettitte would also very likely be in position to know if Clemens used steroids and H.G.H. Players generally might not have stood around the water cooler and talked about steroids, but Clemens and Pettitte were so close — Clemens aborted a brief retirement to join Pettitte in Houston — it would defy common sense to think one didn’t know what the other was doing. If Pettitte appears before the Congressional committee and is asked what he knows about Clemens, if he knows, he will be faced with telling the truth or lying. I don’t think he would lie, not a guy who so readily admitted he did what the Mitchell report said he did.

Pettitte isn’t talking right now. “It’s premature for Andy to have any comment,” Jay Reisinger, his lawyer, said after landing in Houston for a meeting with Pettitte. “It’s not something we can comment on.”

Pettitte did the right thing by admitting his use, Gossage said, and others should follow. Gossage talked, on the conference call, about the history of the game and the great players who played it and how “they can’t allow steroids to get into the history of the game.”

“If you did it,” he added, “the best thing is to come clean, ’fess up, and life will go on.”