Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (112051)	1/9/2008 10:39:52 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Respond to of 173976

Duplicate...

To: Brumar89 who wrote (112051)	1/9/2008 10:40:15 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

No, there's a lot of evidence most, perhaps all the NT, dates to the first century and reflects eyewitness testimony. [t] What evidence would that be that is not 100-150 years old after the alleged fact?[/t] 3. There are not plenty of people being kept alive that are brain dead, ie no brain waves..... I disagree. As far as I know there is no testing done that people have to pass to be allowed to continue to live. [t]The testing has usually already been done and medical opinion has been expressed. The husband or family are perfectly free, I think, to keep their loved one on artificial life support for as long as they are willing to pay for it. The husband wishes, in the absence of a living will, takes precedence.[/t] You folks are exaggerating the brain dead argument. All she needed to stay alive was food and water. Her brain continued to control her basic bodily functions - breathing, digestion, movement. [t]All a vegetable needs is food and water also[/t]