Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (88801)	1/9/2008 9:24:19 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Respond to of 93284

So you think that voters are reluctant to tell pollsters about voting against an African-American candidate? It's certainly possible.

To: Bill who wrote (88801)	1/9/2008 9:26:33 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 93284

Yeah..it was a shocker! I would definitely have bet against her....

To: Bill who wrote (88801)	1/9/2008 9:35:29 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Prof. Jon Krosnick of Stanford University has another argument: That the order of names on the New Hampshire ballot - in which, by random draw, Clinton was toward the top, Obama at the bottom - netted her about 3 percentage points more than she'd have gotten otherwise. That's not enough to explain the gap in some of the polls, which presumably randomized candidate names, but it might hold part of the answer. blogs.abcnews.com