Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (112094)	1/9/2008 4:25:33 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Bush's Iraq policy is indefensible. He should have done the honorable thing like LBJ did in 1968 and stepped down voluntarily. Very similar situations. Both lied us into a costly and humiliating war which stuck our military in the middle of a third world civil war in a corrupt land we didn't understand. In both, the US won many battles, but in the end that was unimportant because there was never a military solution to the perceived problem to begin with. Ron Paul is right. What would we all do if China invaded us and told us our government needs to be like theirs? What if they occupied us and took our resources and appointed puppet leaders?> What would we do? We would fight them eternally until they were either all dead or they left. I would think this is common sense. It's a lesson that's been taught over and over since The Roman Empire and Alexander The Great. And does anyone really believe our goal for invading was ethical and that all we wanted to do was liberate the Iraqi people? Ha! The Bushies don't give a damn about the Iraqi people, and everyone knows that.