Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (15077)	1/9/2008 3:49:08 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

So racism worked in his favor?

To: longnshort who wrote (15077)	1/9/2008 3:56:25 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Re: politically correct" dishonesty displayed by many liberal voters. Except for the ones in IOWA, right? (Remember... he beat the poll numbers there. So, your argument is turned on it's head there. :-) I think idiots are trying to make TOO MUCH out of the New Hampshire results. The end result was a very close race, with two main male candidates taking a much larger percentage of the vote then the one woman.... The electorate was very volatile. REMEMBER, just two weeks ago Hillary was running a solid 20% AHEAD of Obama in the polling there. It looks like the one major demographic cohort which rallied to her side in the last days was "Democrat women over 50" and "women with a high school education", which puts the very close final result into a bit of context. No particular evidence (especially when throwing Iowa into the analysis) of "repressed racism"... not that there isn't any racism left in America these days. :-)