Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (15086)	1/9/2008 4:09:40 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

Oh, I thing the inherent differences between a caucus and a primary election (for example the 15% threshold for 'viability', etc.) accounts for a heck of a LOT MORE of the variance. Come back to your argument when you have some additional evidence for it. (Perhaps Michigan or South Carolina or Nevada or Florida will help you make your case....) Me? So far I'm going with the hard evidence for the male/female dynamic. The so-called "waitress effect". The afterglow from her 'moisting up' on command... and the commonly seen desire of New Hampshirites to 'stick it to Iowa'. :-) (Still... in just two weeks Obama chopped her clear 20 point lead in the polls down to just two points. That ain't chicken feed...)