SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (19473)1/10/2008 10:51:57 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
Jan. 9, 2008, 9:54AM
COMMENTARY
$2,500 cars = $200 oil?

By LOREN STEFFY
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle

Last week we were talking about oil hitting $100.

Is it too early to think about $200?

Not on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Options for December delivery of crude at $200 are the hottest bet in the market, with the number of contracts rising a record tenfold in the past two months, according to Bloomberg News.

Options are basically an insurance policy that traders use to protect themselves from the possibility that crude prices will double this year as they did last year.

While the chance of hitting $200 in a year is unlikely,
the surge in the options speaks to the changing nature of the world's oil economy.

Oil prices have been rising because worldwide supply is struggling to keep pace with demand.

Political unrest in Nigeria, for example, has crimped production from that country during the past two years.

Mexico has seen production from its most prolific oil field fall significantly.

Saudi Arabia missed a key deadline for starting production from a new
field.

No time to relax
All of this, of course, is what helped push oil to $100 last week. Perhaps you even breathed a little easier as prices settled back this week.

Don't.

On Thursday, the Indian automaker Tata Motors is expected to unveil a car that sells for $2,500.

That's less than some Americans will spend on a big-screen high-definition television before the Super Bowl. But it's within reach for many in India's emerging middle class, where the nominal per capita income is $1,089, according to the International Monetary
Fund.

Car of sacrifices
The car, of course, is not something most Americans would want to drive. Tata's design codifies cheap, and the sacrifices are legion, according to a description in the New York Times. Standard safety equipment for most U.S. vehicles, for example, costs more than $2,500.

The new Tata will not, by our standards, be safe or environmentally friendly, and it probably won't be fun to drive. It has a maximum horsepower of about 35, the Times reported, so it's more lawn mower than muscle car.

But that's not the point. Tata knows that most people who already own cars won't be interested in its new model, whose name hasn't been revealed.

It's targeting the hundreds of millions of people in the developing world who now ride scooters or bicycles or walk.

If it succeeds, crude prices may continue their climb of the past year. The Tata probably will consume far less gasoline than the sport utility monstrosities common on American highways, but even the addition of several hundred million lawn mowers would rattle the markets.

"This is going to really shoot demand to levels we have not seen before," said Michael Economides, an oil expert at the University of Houston and a former adviser to several state-owned oil companies. "That's going to open up segments of the population that weren't accessible."

In China, for example, demand for oil surged in recent years as more people moved to urban areas, their incomes rose, and they bought cars. Now, 1,000 new cars take to the streets of Beijing daily, Economides said.

Mobility options
Tata is, in essence, offering mobility to the emerging middle-class economies of India, Vietnam, Pakistan, China and much of Africa. We know, better than anyone, what a middle class does when it adopts a device that fundamentally changes lifestyles: It never lets
go.

In fact, it upgrades. The people buying $2,500 Tatas today will someday be buying more expensive models with more car-ness — bigger and heavier bodies, more powerful engines and more options like air conditioning and electronics. All of which translates into even greater demand for fuel.

"The price of oil is becoming less and less dependent on what happens in the U.S.," Economides said.

Today's glorified lawn mowers could be the emerging world's Model T.

That's why the Model T's maker also is angling on the Indian market. Ford said Tuesday it's doubling production in India, investing $500 million and plans to make an inexpensive car.

Renault-Nissan and an Indian-Japanese joint venture also are working on cheap cars, the Times reported.

So, last week we saw $100 oil, and this week we're talking about $200.

It may seem far-fetched given that all signs indicate the U.S., the world's biggest energy consuming economy, is headed into recession. Oil forecasters surveyed by Bloomberg are predicting that prices will fall as low as $75 a barrel by the fourth quarter.

Doubts it's going down
Economides doesn't buy it.

"I see it only going up, not down," he said.

On the floor of the Nymex, some traders aren't taking any chances. More than 5,000 option contracts at $200 have been sold.

Sooner or later, all those glorified lawn mowers are going to need fill-ups.

Loren Steffy is the Chronicle's business columnist. His commentary appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Contact him at loren.steffy@chron.com. His blog is at blogs.chron.com.

chron.com



To: FJB who wrote (19473)1/10/2008 1:17:58 PM
From: Elmer Flugum  Respond to of 36921
 
The one-lakh car

economist.com

No lakh of daring

Jan 10th 2008

Tata unveils its 21st-century Indian version of the “people's car”

RATAN TATA, chairman of the Tata group of companies, has a cerebral and cordial manner. But the “one-lakh car”, which Tata Motors unveiled in Delhi to a rapt public on January 10th, is a product of impatience and chutzpah. Instead of waiting for the great swell of prosperity in India and elsewhere to create millions of customers for his company's products, Mr Tata has decided to wade out—further than any one has gone before—to bring a car to them.

Small is beautiful

In India one lakh means 100,000, and Tata will sell the most basic version of its new car at 100,000 rupees, or $2,500 (not including taxes and the cost of transporting it to the showrooms). This is roughly half the price of its nearest rival, and little more than the cost of a three-wheeled auto-rickshaw. But the “NANO”, as the car is called, is no rickshaw. Apart from the fourth wheel and the doors, it has a 623cc engine that will muster 33 brake horsepower. The car should eke out 50 miles to the gallon, Mr Tata says. It complies with the “Euro III” pollution standards that prevail in India and should meet the tougher Euro IV standards with a bit of tweaking.

Tata Motors is best known for its trucks, lovingly decorated and recklessly driven, that clatter along India's highways. It started making small passenger cars only a decade ago. Its low-cost car project has set a trend. Mr Tata says he is “quite gratified” that other firms are following suit. Bajaj Auto, which is known for its two- and three-wheelers, said on January 8th that it hoped to team up with Renault and Nissan to produce its own low-cost car. Fiat, Ford, Honda and Toyota also have cheap models in the works. Tata may discover a market, only for others to crowd into it. “It's not our God-given domain,” says Mr Tata.

Cheap cars can be expensive to invent. Tata experimented with a smaller engine, but was dissatisfied with its performance. It hoped to use continuous-variable transmission, but had to make do, for now, with manual. Tata's rivals may be able to free-ride on its efforts, copying the cost-cutting tricks it had to discover through painstaking trial and error. “It will be an easier task for them than it was for us,” Mr Tata admits.

Competitors will, for example, notice how Tata shrank the car into what its chairman calls a “concise package”, with the engine at the back and the wheels at the “extremities”. The result is 21% more space inside than the Maruti 800, says Ravi Kant, the managing director of Tata Motors, but it is 8% shorter. Not that that will make much difference to the traffic jams which the NANO will worsen.

Commuting in India's cities can be both cosy and deadly. Children squeeze snugly between father at the handlebars of a motorcycle, while mother rides side-saddle at the back. This precarious balancing act, says Mr Tata was the “visual target” he had in mind when he first conceived of the need “to create another form of transport”. About 1,800 people die on Delhi's roads each year, perhaps one-third of them on two-wheelers. Only 5% die in cars. Tata's project may pose risks for investors, but it promises unaccustomed safety for its customers.



To: FJB who wrote (19473)12/17/2009 9:26:28 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 36921
 
Cap and Trade in Practice
How to get paid for laying off workers.
DECEMBER 17, 2009.

The world's carboncrats are beavering away this week on a vast new global cap-and-trade scheme that President Obama wants the U.S. to join. But before we do, maybe Americans should understand how this already works in practice. Union workers, take note.

The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 required signatories to reduce their carbon emissions, and the European Union in 2005 launched its own cap-and-trade system. The program sets a limit on carbon emissions, and companies are issued free carbon allowances that they can buy or sell based on their emissions needs.

Fast forward to this month's news that Corus, Europe's second-largest steel producer, is shuttering a giant U.K. steelmaking plant at Redcar, cutting 1,700 jobs. Corus blames the recession that has cut steel demand and says the British government hasn't done enough to help it.

Whatever the truth of that, there's little doubt that cap and trade made the closure much easier. The decline in steel production means European steelmakers have surplus carbon allowances. According to Carbon Market Data, a European research firm, in 2008 Corus had the second largest surplus of EU carbon allowances—7.5 million.

The EU is looking for ways to drive today's depressed allowance price of about $21 apiece back up to former highs of about $50, so Corus has the potential for a $375 million windfall. By closing Redcar's annual capacity of three million tons of steel, Corus will produce six million fewer tons of CO2. That means more carbon allowances, which could translate into about $300 million a year if credits hit $50. Corus is essentially being paid to lay off British workers.

Corus will also profit if it moves the production to India. As part of Kyoto, the United Nations created the Clean Development Mechanism to encourage Western companies to invest in developing-world factories. Participants are financially rewarded based on the amount of carbon they "save" with more efficient plants.

Corus was bought in 2007 by Tata, India's largest steel company. The Indian steel industry is set to more than double production to some 124 million tons a year by 2011-2012. Were Corus to move production to a "clean" Indian factory, it could receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually from the Clean Development Fund. The kicker is that none of this results in fewer carbon emissions. A Corus plant in India might be more efficient by Indian standards, but it will be no more efficient than Redcar.

We should add that all of this is precisely what Kyoto envisioned. The idea is to tax Western industry and then send the proceeds to developing countries as an incentive to join the anticarbon crusade. But unless governments close their borders to foreign investment, business will flow to where the carbon tariff is least punishing. China and India understand this, which is why they won't agree at Copenhagen to anything that reduces this advantage.

The Corus story also shows that cap and trade isn't really a free market. Markets develop to efficiently allocate resources and capital. Carbon cap and trade is a government-rigged market, in which carbon allowances are dispensed based on political influence. Such a system is ripe for manipulation, and Corus is merely the latest example.

To summarize: Cap and trade is a scheme that would impose heavy carbon taxes and allowances on U.S. industries, which would then have an incentive to move overseas themselves, or to sell those allowances to overseas companies that could use them to become more competitive against U.S. companies. Like the 1,700 Brits at Redcar, American workers would be the big losers.

online.wsj.com