Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (45870)	1/10/2008 11:29:33 AM
From: coug	Respond to of 543847

Thanks for the response Suma, I might have misunderstood the reason many women went for Clinton but I had the impression many wanted to get back at men and in doing so voted against their own best interests, that being PEACE in many cases... I was probably wrong though, I am wrong a lot.. :) Anyway, I would like to see Mike Bloomberg throw his hat in the ring with a progressive for a running mate as a THIRD party choice, no matter who gets the nominations on either side. I THINK he is a social progressive and a REAL fiscal conservative like myself. At least that's what I am led to believe. If he ran, he could be vetted so people like myself could really get to know his policies.. One very important point for me, probably the most right now, I would want to know is how he stands on foreign intervention.. A campaign could clear this up. Hopefully, but who really knows until after the fact...:) Besides the time is right to break up this old, outdated, two party system we have. A perfect storm is brewing to do it. Besides, we might not get another chance.. c