SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2398)2/1/2008 6:45:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Microsoft Offers to Buy Yahoo for $44.6 Billion, or $31 a Share

By Phil Serafino

Feb. 1 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp., the world's biggest software maker, offered to buy Yahoo! Inc. for about $44.6 billion, or $31 a share.

To contact the reporter on this story: Phil Serafino in Paris at pserafino@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: February 1, 2008 06:33 EST
______________________________________________________________

Daily Briefing By Colin Barr

dailybriefing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com

February 1, 2008, 6:46 am

Microsoft makes a bid for Yahoo

Microsoft (MSFT) is offering Yahoo (YHOO) a way out of its misery, but so far Yahoo doesn’t seem to want one. Microsoft said Friday morning it had proposed to buy the struggling Net giant for $31 a share, or $44.6 billion, in cash and stock. The deal would offer Yahoo shareholders a 62% premium to Thursday’s closing price, and combine the forces of two powerful Internet companies that are having trouble on their own competing with Google (GOOG). “We have great respect for Yahoo,” said Microsoft chief Steve Ballmer, “and together we can offer an increasingly exciting set of solutions for consumers, publishers and advertisers while becoming better positioned to compete in the online services market.” Microsoft’s letter to Yahoo indicates that a year ago, Microsoft approached Yahoo’s board but was told that “now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction.” Given the plunge in Yahoo stock and the prospect of a damaging recession this year, if now isn’t the right time, it’s hard to imagine what is.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2398)2/4/2008 4:10:17 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Yahoo Owners May Prefer Microsoft Bid to Google Fight (Update1)

By Ari Levy

Feb. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Jerry Yang, who pledged last year to lead his team of ``Yahoos'' to victory, may find investors would rather team up with Microsoft Corp.

Yahoo! Inc. rose the most since its first day of trading when Microsoft offered $44.6 billion for the company, the second- most popular search engine, on Feb. 1. Yang, who returned as Yahoo's chief executive officer to try to reverse a two-year stock slump, had presided over a 32 percent drop before the bid.

Microsoft said Yahoo executives snubbed its overtures last year in favor of tackling Internet search leader Google Inc. independently. Yahoo's stock performance shows investors don't embrace that strategy and that Yang's promises to revamp the company's search engine and gain on Google were in vain.

``It's hard to look shareholders in the eye and say it doesn't make sense,'' Robert Doll, chief investment officer of global equities at BlackRock Inc. in Princeton, New Jersey, said of Microsoft's unsolicited offer. ``There won't be a whole lot of options for Yahoo.'' He oversees $1.3 billion in assets, including stock in Microsoft, the world's biggest software maker.

Microsoft's $31-a-share bid came three days after Sunnyvale, California-based Yahoo posted an eighth straight quarter of declining profit and projected sales that trailed most analysts' estimates.

Shares Gain

Yahoo was trading at $19.18 before the offer. The stock rose $9.20 to $28.38 in Nasdaq Stock Market trading after the Microsoft announcement, and extended the gain to the equivalent of $28.73 at 9:28 a.m. in German trading today.

Microsoft rose 1.1 percent to the equivalent of $30.77 at 9:25 a.m. in German trading from the close of $30.45 in the U.S. on Feb. 1. Google added 0.4 percent to $518 in Germany from last week's U.S. close of $515.90.

Google Chief Executive Officer Eric Schmidt called Yahoo's Yang and offered a potential partnership between the two companies to thwart Microsoft's $44.6 billion bid, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reported today, both citing people familiar with the matter.

Yahoo said in a statement on Feb. 1 that it will review the proposal ``promptly.'' Officials haven't commented publicly since then. Yang was not available to comment for this story, according to Yahoo spokeswoman Diana Wong.

Back in Charge

Yang, 39, agreed to take the reins at Yahoo in June, replacing Terry Semel, after its share of Web searches tumbled and the company lost out on sales of graphics-based ads mainly to social-networking sites like News Corp.'s MySpace and Facebook Inc.

In Semel's six years at the helm, he built Yahoo's online ad business through acquisitions and internal development. While the shares jumped almost sevenfold under his watch, Google's rising dominance led the stock to plunge 35 percent in 2006, and investors began calling for Semel to resign.

``I'm ready to rally our near-12,000 Yahoos around the world,'' Yang said on a conference call when he took over. He said he planned to foster ``a winning culture, while strengthening our leadership team to galvanize Yahoos around our goals.''

Yang's Efforts

Microsoft's bid came too soon for Yang to prove himself, said Ellen Siminoff, who worked with him at Yahoo for seven years and now leads Mountain View, California-based Efficient Frontier, which helps companies advertise on search engines.

``It's hard to get any sort of change that quickly,'' Siminoff said. ``He would rather sell having fixed the company than sell after a perception of weakness.''

Microsoft chose Yahoo as a partner after repeatedly coming in a distant third in Internet searches and failing to bolster advertising revenue on its own. Yahoo would give Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft the most popular group of Web sites in the U.S., which reach about 500 million people worldwide.

The U.S. Justice Department is ``interested'' in reviewing the antitrust implications of the deal, agency spokeswoman Gina Talamona said last week. Neelie Kroes, commissioner of competition for the European Commission, said her agency also would scrutinize a Microsoft-Yahoo deal.

Google said yesterday that the offer ``raises troubling questions'' for Web users, and questioned whether Microsoft would seek to exert ``inappropriate'' influence over the Internet. Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith disputed Google's claims in a statement.

Rejecting Microsoft

Microsoft and Yahoo explored ways to work together in late 2006 and early 2007, according to a letter by Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer to the Yahoo board dated Jan. 31. Yahoo rejected the idea of being taken over by Microsoft a year ago, according to Ballmer, 51.

``I doubt that Jerry and David want to sell Yahoo,'' said Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of basketball's Dallas Mavericks, who sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo in 1999. ``But this is a very smart move for Microsoft. There will surely be a ton of duplication on the technology side, which should cut costs significantly.''

The offer from Microsoft is one of many options Yahoo is evaluating, Yang and Chairman Roy Bostock said in a Feb. 1 e-mail to employees obtained by Bloomberg News. The board will respond after reviewing the alternatives, they said. If Yahoo accepts the deal, Yang stands to get about $1.6 billion in cash or Microsoft stock for his 52.8 million shares.

Yahoo's investment bankers, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., are approaching other potential bidders in search of a higher offer, the New York Times reported Feb. 2.

Higher Bid?

Microsoft may have to raise its price to win over Yahoo's board, said Jason Helfstein, an Oppenheimer & Co. analyst in New York. Helfstein suggested in a Feb. 1 report that an increase to as much as $40 a share, or about $53.5 billion, was possible. Microsoft spokesman Bill Cox declined to comment.

Yang and co-founder David Filo, both graduate students started the company in 1995 with $2 million from venture capital firm Sequoia Capital in Menlo Park, California. Word of ``Jerry and David's Guide to the World Wide Web'' had spread beyond their trailer at Stanford University, helping the site get up to a million hits a day within months of its debut, according to Yahoo's corporate Web site.

Yahoo's sales increased from $20 million in 1996 to more than $1 billion four years later. As traffic on the Web soared, so did advertising revenue, helping Yahoo's stock market value jump to more than $100 billion, most of which was lost in the technology-stock crash of 2000.

Acquisitions

To bolster the search business, Yahoo bought Overture Services Inc. and Inktomi Corp. in 2003, adding a service for online queries as well as software for selling links next to search results. The company previously used Google's search engine.

By the time the acquisitions were finished, Mountain View- based Google had already built its lead in search. Google's sales surpassed Yahoo's in the first quarter of 2005 as businesses bought more text links, ads that appear next to query results.

Yang's latest efforts, which include bolstering the search engine to include links to photos, videos and music, failed to stem the slide. Google's share of the U.S. search market rose to 56 percent in December from 53 percent in June, while Yahoo's share dropped to 18 percent from 20 percent, according to New York-based Nielsen Online.

The stock price tumbled along with it. As of Jan. 31, Yahoo's stock had dropped 32 percent since Yang took over, compared with a 9.5 percent gain for Google and a 10 percent drop for the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.

Too Good

Former employees such as Siminoff and Brian Steel, who joined Yahoo in 2003 with the acquisition of Overture, say Yang probably will take Microsoft's offer because the price is too good to ignore.

``At the end of the day, he's got a fiduciary responsibility to a whole bunch of folks,'' said Steel, who left in 2006 and later became chief of VoloMedia Inc. in Mountain View. ``He ended up with a big challenge, and it wasn't something that was going to turn around overnight.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Ari Levy in San Francisco at alevy5@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: February 4, 2008 03:37 EST



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2398)2/6/2008 3:08:58 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Who’s the 800-Pound Gorilla?
______________________________________________________________

Editorial
The New York Times
February 6, 2008

In matters of business philosophy and practice, there are a lot of reasons to suspect Microsoft’s latest foray into the online world. It has a troubling history of bullying — and even worse — to undercut all challengers. Its relentless efforts to lock users into its software are particularly ill fitted to the Internet’s open spirit.

None of that is sufficient reason for regulators or lawmakers to block its attempt to buy Yahoo, the online portal and search engine.

Protests by Google — which has more heft than Microsoft when it comes to the Internet — that the combination would stifle competition are self-serving and disingenuous. Double that for Google’s position that the Internet’s openness would be better served if Google were to set up some sort of alliance with Yahoo instead.

From a business standpoint, Microsoft’s $44.6 billion bid for Yahoo, which amounted to a 62 percent premium to its share price when the bid was announced, might not be a great idea. Microsoft shareholders seem to believe the deal is a pretty bad one: share prices have fallen more than 10 percent since.

When it comes to the lucrative search market, Google, not Microsoft, is the 800-pound gorilla. Last December, nearly 6 out of 10 searches in the United States were conducted on Google sites, according to comScore. Only 23 percent were done on Yahoo sites and 10 percent on Microsoft sites. Google’s share of worldwide searches was even greater. Google’s online advertising revenue vastly outstrips that of Yahoo and Microsoft combined. By this count, a merger between Microsoft and Yahoo would boost competition, creating a more effective competitor to challenge Google’s dominance.

Antitrust regulators should still carefully examine Microsoft’s bid. It is true, as Google officials have argued, that Microsoft and Yahoo are bigger and have more overlapping services in other Internet segments. In combination, their portals receive more visitors — to check news and other information — than Google’s. The two have a much larger share of Web e-mail accounts and instant-messaging services. These businesses, however, generate a much smaller share of online revenue.

It took regulatory pressure to convince Microsoft to drop its latest efforts to hustle users toward its MSN engine — and shut all others out. That certainly suggests regulators must remain eternally vigilant against Microsoft’s baser instincts. If Google can support specific arguments about why a combination of Microsoft and Yahoo would be anticompetitive, it should make them. Vague insinuations about the threat from the bad boys from Redmond just sound like so much empty whining.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2398)2/25/2008 9:00:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
A Beautiful Mind: Microsoft over Google

seekingalpha.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2398)2/26/2008 9:09:25 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Will Cisco’s 'Big Switch' Provoke a New Technology War?

seekingalpha.com