Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3803)	1/11/2008 6:24:18 PM
From: Katelew	Respond to of 42652

Maybe I misspoke. By mandate, I was thinking of the requirement that all driver's carry liability car insurance.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3803)	1/11/2008 6:43:05 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42652

I believe that would require a Constitutional Amendment. Maybe it should but social security didn't at least not in a practical sense (whether or not it is truly constitutional effectively it is because the courts have not struck it down). Yes people aren't actually required to be enrolled in social security at birth (can't claim them as a deduction if you don't enroll, but you could skip the deduction), but you can't avoid the program forever (if you work you have to pay SS taxes)