SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (3852)1/12/2008 8:47:42 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
I agree with all your comments.

And I was picturing catastrophic coverage as perhaps a beginning, something which could provide a transition to more comprehensive coverage IF that's what the public wanted and was willing to pay for.

Have a great weekend! I'm gone for now.



To: Lane3 who wrote (3852)1/14/2008 12:26:34 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
What would likely, almost surely, emerge is comprehensive insurance, not just catastrophic.

Which is probably my main reason for being against a national catastrophic health insurance system.

Even if I didn't think it would extend beyond catastrophic insurance I probably wouldn't be a big fan, but I'd probably accept it, perhaps even like certain aspects of it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News