SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (234576)1/13/2008 10:05:17 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 794490
 
I agree it's a big issue. Perfect for a demagogue.



To: John Carragher who wrote (234576)1/13/2008 12:54:48 PM
From: Jan W  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794490
 
The 100 gallon purchases aren't always because folks can't afford more - though saying so certainly makes for better tv drama. The reality is that most people (rich & poor alike) aren't stupid - when the fuel oil prices are at their highs (and if they're not on a budget plan), it's common practice to purchase in smaller increments to wait out the price increase so that their tanks can be filled or topped off with cheaper oil in a few weeks. Certainly no sane person rushes to fill their tanks when the prices are so high. A hundred gallons will last awhile - and in all likelihood the next 100 will be a lot cheaper. [My small business is heated with fuel oil. We bought 275 gal at the beginning of the season and still have about 1/4 tank left. If the prices don't come down when we need more, we too will join the ranks of people buying in 100 gal increments until the prices come back down again - as they always do.] And, again, you have to bear in mind that we had record snowfall for the month of December and that has a huge impact on oil storage and delivery. (Massive centralized tank farms offer no great benefit in harsh climates and rural areas. In addition to their primary storage tanks, most oil companies here decentralize and maintain smaller fuel oil storage tanks right within the neighborhoods or communities they serve. My oil provider maintains 2 such tanks on a small lot a couple streets over from me.)

For all that Edwards made fuel oil prices and assistance one of his big town hall topics, he ended up with 17% of the democratic vote which should say something about how his message resonated with the locals. Even if people have to scrimp & save and make do with less in the wintertime, the NH population as a whole hates entitlements and government give-away programs. We have no state income or sales tax here - so there are very few "assistance" type programs available. No one moves here for the welfare benefits, that's for sure. If we didn't want it that way, we'd start taxing ourselves to death like MA (and many other states) do their citizens.

Also, there is a flip side that's easy to ignore. How many poor & elderly die in the south during the summer heat because they can't afford the exorbitant air conditioning/electric bills. Like many here in NH, I don't even own an air conditioner - so we get our break during the warmer seasons. My electric bills during spring, summer & fall are probably a fraction of what most people pay in other parts of the country. And personally, I'd rather pinch pennies and put on an extra sweater in the winter than wither away in the summer heat.

On another topic .. the pollsters are still trying to figure out a way to redeem themselves!

This just in: Pollsters were right
By SHAWNE K. WICKHAM
New Hampshire Sunday News Staff

After Hillary Clinton's surprise victory over fellow Democratic Sen. Barack Obama in Tuesday's New Hampshire Primary, everyone was asking: How did the polls get it so wrong?

They didn't, several pollsters told the New Hampshire Sunday News last week; events on the ground and last-minute deciders changed the outcome.

"We didn't have a polling problem," said Dick Bennett, president of American Research Group. "We ran out of time."

<yeah, right!>

unionleader.com