Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (100075)	1/14/2008 8:49:36 AM
From: Travis_Bickle	Respond to of 306849

I think we are SOL as far as that goes.

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (100075)	1/14/2008 10:17:10 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 306849

RE:"She was completely spineless when her husband humiliated her in front of the world." Never quite understood that either. She embarrassed herself beyond reproach. Blaming it on a "vast right wing conspiracy". I guess the populous sees her as a victim. Do we need a victim as president? Hill knows Obama is a dynamic speaker/motivator. Hill will attack on "where's the beef". Bill says he's a fairytale. The good thing for Hill is that Obama is acting like a buffer, protecting her from challenges from othe dems. The bad thing for Hill is that Obamas campaign is steamrolling. The buzzword is "change". As for Hill, is Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton really change?

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (100075)	1/14/2008 11:21:58 AM
From: Gary Burton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

We see what we want to see I guess What I see is an Obama that in reality is a lightweight 'fraud' and a Hillary that is the real change agent. I'd vote for H anyday, if I was an American-which I'm not As a man, I was quite disappointed in Bill-he had everything going for him and couldn't stem his sexual urges--but I actually think Hillary is the more substantive of the two. She's the glue.

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (100075)	1/14/2008 6:06:55 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 306849

the difference is that we were in great fiscal shape under Clinton. To a lot of people (I am one) the fiscal issues that Bush's doctrines have created are the biggest problems for the US. Clinton knew how to manage this economy. We were paying off the debt, and from the first moment he came in office the fiscal situation of the US started to improve. One obvious thing that the Clintons seem to understand is that TAX CUTS are not the answer to every economic woe. That is a massive red herring that perpetuates our problems.