SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (112782)1/15/2008 5:47:57 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
"Terri Schiavo wasn't suffering and needed no relief from suffereing "

You're contradicting yourself , first you say she could see, hear, talk, eat orally, and now you say she wasn't suffering apparently because she had none of those capabilities.


I didn't say all of those things. In particular, I didn't say the last part. She wasn't in pain and letting her continue to live would not have caused her suffering.

Did she say she wasn't suffering?

She didn't have to. She gave no sign of suffering.

Now if you're asking about the 13 last days of her life when she was dying of thirst, well she may have suffered then.

"Doesn't the Nazi experience with it disturb you a little?"

You're a very confused person......killing someone who doesn't want to die is not euthanasia.


The only person who said Terri Schiavo wanted to die was her husband. She left no written expression of her wishes. And her husband had changed his story on that issue once he had a financial incentive in her dying instead of living.