Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (112821)	1/15/2008 8:34:35 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

And legally, that's the only person who counts.....were they happy together before the tragedy?" I don't know. But I think the fact he was engaged to another woman with whom he had a child should be considered. "She wasn't in pain and letting her continue to live would not have caused her suffering." And what that have accomplished for that poor woman....? We don't know what the quality of her life was and we don't have the right to judge it. We know her family was devoted to her and spent time with her. Who was paying for her care? And where was she being cared for? There was a lawsuit - collected about $750K after legal fees - it was put in a fund to pay for her care. Which wasn't that expensive. Anything left after she died, went to the husband.